By Amin Kef (Ranger)
The Institute for Legal Research and Advocacy for Justice (ILRAJ) has called on the Government of Sierra Leone to reconsider and withdraw the proposed appointment of Edmond Sylvester Alpha as Chief Electoral Commissioner of the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL), citing legal, procedural and democratic concerns.
In a statement issued on Thursday, ILRAJ referenced a letter from the Office of the President dated February 10, 2026, which nominated Edmond Sylvester Alpha pursuant to Section 32(3) of the 1991 Constitution. While acknowledging the need to fill vacancies in key public institutions, the legal advocacy body argued that proceeding with a substantive appointment at this time risks undermining ongoing constitutional and electoral reforms.
According to ILRAJ, the Constitution of Sierra Leone (Amendment) Act 2025 Bill, currently before Parliament, proposes significant changes to Section 32, including the establishment of a Search and Nomination Committee to oversee transparent and merit-based appointments to the ECSL. The organization contends that confirming a Chief Electoral Commissioner before Parliament concludes deliberations on the proposed reforms would preempt the legislative process and weaken the spirit of the amendments.
“Mr. Alpha is already serving in an acting capacity, ensuring institutional continuity,” ILRAJ noted, adding that rushing to confirm him permanently may entrench existing appointment practices before new constitutional safeguards take effect. The group urged President Julius Maada Bio to withdraw the nomination and await the outcome of parliamentary consideration of the Amendment Bill.
The organization further expressed concern over what it described as a pattern of partisan appointments to leadership positions within institutions expected to function independently. It referenced public perceptions surrounding appointments during and after the disputed 2023 elections, noting that several ECSL commissioners were widely viewed as being aligned with the ruling Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP), a situation that contributed to public distrust in the electoral process.
Similar concerns, ILRAJ stated, have also been raised regarding the current leadership of the Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC). The advocacy group warned that appointments perceived as politically aligned risk eroding institutional neutrality and transforming oversight bodies into extensions of executive influence.
ILRAJ also questioned the adequacy of consultations conducted under Section 32(3) of the Constitution, which requires the President to appoint ECSL members “after consultation with the leaders of all registered political parties” and subject to parliamentary approval. The group argued that consultations have historically been reduced to brief written notifications requesting feedback within a limited timeframe, often three working days, which it described as insufficient for meaningful engagement.
“This approach falls short of genuine consultation and undermines the constitutional intent of multiparty consensus,” the statement asserted.
The organization therefore called on President Bio to withdraw the nomination, conduct authentic consultations with political stakeholders, and align the process with Tripartite Committee Recommendation 36 as well as the pending constitutional reforms. It also urged Parliament to exercise caution in ratifying the nomination and to prioritize reforms aimed at strengthening transparency, inclusivity and public confidence in the country’s democratic institutions.
ILRAJ concluded by emphasizing that credible and independent electoral management remains central to democratic stability and national cohesion in Sierra Leone.
