Motor Mechanic Jailed for 57 Years for Robbing an Octogenarian

Honourable Justice Komba Kamanda
Honourable Justice Komba Kamanda

Court of Appeal Judge, Honourable Justice Komba Kamanda has on the 3rd March 2022 sentenced one 44-year-old Motor Mechanic, Mustapha Kabba, to 57 years’ imprisonment for Robbery with Aggravation committed against Octogenarian, Kitty Fadlu-Deen.

The sentence was slammed after an eleven-member jury unanimously returned a guilty verdict in respect of a four counts indictment including attempting to strangle and causing grievous bodily harm.

According to the particulars of Offence, the accused on the 1st September 2020, in the Western Area of Freetown being armed with a Black Powerline Semi-Automatic Gun robbed Mrs. Fadlu-Deen off one dark grey 2018 Toyota Rav-4 Jeep valued $24,500,000 equivalent to Le245, 000,000,000; one Samsung J-20 mobile phone valued $150 equivalent to Le1, 500,000, caused her grievous bodily harm and attempted to strangle her.

The convict denied the allegations upon his arraignment before the Court.

In his opening address to the jurors at the commencement of the trial, prosecuting Lawyer, Yada Williams, said that the accused was before the court on a four counts indictment which he must prove.

He said there was enough evidence to prove that on the 1st of September 2020 at about 8:15 am, the accused went to the premises of Mrs. Fadlu-Deen at Lumley and upon arrival at the house, encountered unarmed security guards but pretended as if he was on the phone with Mrs. Fadlu-Deen to trick the guards to have access to the premises.

“He went upstairs, tricked his way in and there started the agony, pain and sufferings of this over 80-year old woman. She was physically manhandled by the accused person and the evidence will reveal all of this. She was dragged into one of the toilets inside the house where she was girded with a lot of toiled tissues and towels stuffed into her mouth so that she could not raise an alarm for the guards outside or neighbors,’’ Lawyer Williams told the Court.

He continued that for the incident itself to have taken place in broad daylight showed the “effrontery and audacity” of the accused, adding that the accused tied up the old woman and demanded the keys to the vehicle with registration number AQG 834 and was directed to where the keys were kept out of fear.

He said that, “the accused person locked Mrs. Fadlu-Deen in the toilet, took her phone and disappeared with the vehicle which landed in Sierra Leone almost brand new, costing $24,500,000 and with the deception that he was in some kind of relationship with the woman. The guards opened the gates and the accused drove off.”

The old woman, he continued was later able to scream after struggling for a couple of minutes before the servants and neighbors came to her rescue.

The prosecuting lawyer said a report of the incident was made at the Lumley Police Station with Interpol alerted as well as security personnel at the Sierra Leone-Guinea border.

He added that later on the same day, the accused showed up at the Sierra Leone Guinea border with the vehicle with a diplomatic license plate recorded as 19 CD 12 and was intercepted by the Guinean authorities with the gun he had used to terrify the woman.

He stressed that the accused made a number of confessional statements to the police as well as admitted to have sold the woman’s phone which he stole on his way to Guinea.

The prosecution led in evidence a number of witnesses in support of his case.

At the close of the prosecution’s case, the accused claimed that he was being tortured at the Criminal Investigation Department which compelled him to make a confessional statement.

After his claim of torture in the hands of the police, Justice Kamanda conducted a voir dire (trial within trial) to ascertain whether his claims were true but they turned out to be false.

In his allocutus, the convict said he had nothing to say.

In his plea in mitigation, defence lawyer Harold Momoh implored the judge to temper justice with mercy.

Delivering his judgment, Hon. Justice Kamanda said his judgment was informed by the entirety of the evidence, the audacity with which the convict committed the offence, describing it as “violent and diplomatic.”

He added that the way in which the convict did the act showed that he is a “professional criminal.”

“The purpose of law enforcers is to ensure that people live and enjoy their property in peace and safety,” he stated.

Justice Kamanda sentenced the convict to 25 years for count 1, 20 years for count 2, 10 years for count 3 and 2 years for count 4.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here