Home Blog Page 125

Premier Li Qiang Announces China’s New Trade Policy at UNGA

China has issued a landmark position paper on its role within the World Trade Organization (WTO), declaring it will no longer pursue new claims for Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) in current and future trade negotiations. The announcement, delivered by Premier Li Qiang during a United Nations General Assembly side event on 23 September, marks a pivotal moment in China’s evolving role as a leading developing country and an advocate of multilateralism.

The statement comes at a time when the global trading system is under severe strain from rising protectionism, unilateral tariff impositions, and disputes over fair treatment for developing economies. China’s decision, therefore, is being seen as both a political signal and a concrete step to preserve the WTO’s authority and strengthen international cooperation.

Special and Differential Treatment has long been enshrined in WTO agreements as a mechanism to ensure that developing and least-developed countries secure a fair share of the benefits of international trade. The Marrakesh Agreement, which established the WTO in 1995, explicitly recognized the need for such provisions to support development needs.

In its newly circulated position paper, China reaffirmed its identity as the world’s largest developing country and as an enduring member of the Global South. The document warned that any attempt to strip developing nations of SDT rights would erode the fairness and inclusiveness of the multilateral trading system.

“SDT is not a privilege,” the paper emphasized, “but an institutional right of developing members. Without it, the balance of the WTO framework would be compromised.”

China’s accession to the WTO in 2001 was accompanied by fewer SDT benefits than those granted to many other developing members. Since then, Beijing has demonstrated a consistent willingness to take on broader responsibilities, often beyond its formal obligations.

The position paper outlined several instances where China refrained from claiming SDT despite being entitled to do so. These included the Trade Facilitation Agreement, where China voluntarily committed to 94 percent of obligations under Category A, and the negotiations on services regulation and COVID-19 vaccine intellectual property waivers, where Beijing declined to invoke SDT at all.

In fisheries subsidies talks, China pledged not to seek exemptions in the final package of rules as long as its core concerns were addressed. It also made clear it would not utilize SDT proposals advanced by the G90 group of developing members, signaling a pragmatic approach that balances its national interests with global progress.

The timing of this policy shift is significant. With the WTO’s 14th Ministerial Conference scheduled for March 2026 in Cameroon, negotiations are intensifying on issues ranging from subsidy disciplines to digital trade. Analysts suggest that China’s announcement will improve the atmosphere for constructive dialogue and bolster the likelihood of development-oriented outcomes.

The paper directly linked China’s decision to the growing threats posed by protectionism and unilateral measures, particularly the “arbitrary imposition of tariffs by a certain member.” Such actions, Beijing argued, have severely tested the credibility of the WTO and undermined the interests of developing nations.

By voluntarily limiting its future SDT claims, China aims to send a strong message: that it is prepared to shoulder greater responsibility to defend the integrity of the global trading system.

While the move represents a forward-looking adjustment, China was careful to stress that it does not alter its legal status as a developing member of the WTO. Beijing will continue to enjoy SDT benefits under existing agreements and in ongoing negotiations where consensus has already been reached.

Moreover, the decision is confined strictly to the WTO framework. China clarified that it does not set a precedent for its classification or entitlements in other international organizations or treaties.

At its core, the paper presents China’s strategy for balancing national development needs with global responsibilities. Premier Li Qiang framed the decision as a contribution to bridging the North-South divide, strengthening global economic governance, and advancing initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

China also tied its move to the Global Development Initiative, a program championed by Beijing to support inclusive growth in the developing world. By stepping back from new SDT demands, China argues it is creating space for the least-developed countries to push for stronger support within the WTO framework.

Observers note that China’s decision reflects both its growing economic weight and its desire to be seen as a stabilizing force in global trade. While Beijing remains firm in its identification as a developing country, it is signaling a willingness to lead by example in safeguarding multilateralism.

“China has always been a member of the Global South and will always be a part of the developing world,” the paper concluded. “We will continue to practice true multilateralism, defend the rights of developing members, and contribute to building an open and inclusive world economy.”

As WTO members prepare for next year’s ministerial conference in Cameroon, China’s stance could prove instrumental in reshaping the dynamics of trade negotiations and in restoring confidence in the multilateral trading order.

REVEALED!!! Justice Allan B. Halloway’s Suspension: A Matter of Due Process, Not Victimization

By Foday Moriba Conteh

Contrary to widespread reports that Supreme Court Judge, Justice Allan B. Halloway, was suspended simply because he wrote a letter to President Julius Maada Bio accusing the Hon. Chief Justice, Justice Komba Kamanda, of constitutional breaches and human rights violations, fresh investigations by this medium have uncovered the true circumstances behind his suspension.

According to sources, Justice Allan B. Halloway’s suspension was not triggered by his August 11th letter but by a backlog of serious complaints against him some of which date back years. These include:

  • Cases that had sat on his desk for over 15 years without judgment,
  • Allegations of bribery and extortion, and
  • Reports of deliberate delays and questionable practices in handling files.

Investigation revealed that the Chief Justice, in response, directed Justice Allan B. Halloway to clear his backlog of cases. However, Justice Allan B. Halloway failed to comply, a move widely seen as gross insubordination.

Because of this insubordination and public outcry, it was believed that administrative measures were reportedly taken against him. These included:

  • Withholding certain statutory allowances,
  • Refusal to reimburse medical claims,
  • Removal from court panels, and
  • Exclusion from active judicial duties.

While Justice Allan B. Halloway portrayed these measures in his petition as violations of his constitutional rights, sources insist they were disciplinary responses to his own alleged failures and misconduct.

In his 11th August 2025 petition letter to President Bio, Justice Allan B. Halloway accused the Chief Justice of:

  1. Withholding his allowances and blocking his fuel card;
  2. Forcing him to cover medical bills and vehicle expenses, which he framed as a breach of Section 138(3) of the 1991 Constitution;
  3. Removing him from court panels, which he described as an “unconstitutional suspension”; and
  4. Threatening him with disciplinary action in front of other judges.

However, our investigations reveal that while Justice Allan B. Halloway highlighted actions taken against him, he deliberately omitted the context of his alleged insubordination and the serious complaints of misconduct that prompted those actions in the first place.

It was also informed that Justice Allan B. Halloway copied his letter to parties outside the legal framework, contrary to established judicial protocol. The Constitution requires that judges who feel aggrieved by the Chief Justice should petition to the President and the Judicial and Legal Service Commission (JLSC) not other outside parties.

Upon receiving complaints and reviewing the matter, the JLSC exercised its mandate under Section 137(5) of the Constitution of Sierra Leone (1991), which provides that: “If the Judicial and Legal Service Commission presents to the President that the question of removing a Judge of the Superior Court of Judicature, other than the Chief Justice, under subsection (4) ought to be investigated then (a) the President, acting in consultation with the Judicial and Legal Service Commission, shall appoint a tribunal which shall consist of a Chairman and two other members, all of whom shall be persons qualified to hold or have held office as Justices of the Supreme Court.”

Acting on this recommendation, President Bio immediately constituted a tribunal comprising a Chairman and two other Senior Jurists to investigate Justice Allan B. Halloway.

As empowered by Section 137(6) of the Constitution, the President also suspended Justice Allan B. Halloway from duty pending the tribunal’s findings. This was formally conveyed through an official correspondence dated 15th September 2025 (Ref: SF/BF 33/201/01) issued by the Secretary to the President, Barba B. Fortune.

The letter made it clear: “…His Excellency the President hereby suspends you as Judge of the Superior Court of Judicature with immediate effect until the outcome of a Disciplinary Tribunal instituted to investigate your conduct.”

From the foregoing it could be deduced that Justice Allan B. Halloway’s suspension was not a reaction to his letter, but rather the outcome of:

  • Longstanding allegations of misconduct,
  • His failure to obey lawful instructions from the Chief Justice and
  • A recommendation by the JLSC for a tribunal to investigate him.

By framing his suspension solely as retaliation for his letter, Justice Allan B. Halloway, it is believed that he presented a one-sided narrative, omitting his own failings and the legal basis upon which the President acted.

It could be asserted that Justice Allan B. Halloway’s suspension is therefore a matter of due process and accountability, not victimization. The Constitution was followed to the letter: complaints were reviewed, the JLSC advised, a tribunal was set up and the President lawfully suspended him pending investigation.

The final word now rests with the tribunal, which will determine whether Justice Allan B. Halloway will be removed from office or reinstated.

When this medium contacted Justice Allan B. Halloway via his mobile phone to solicit his comments on the matter, as contained in the aforementioned article he responded copiously. See the next page for his response published verbatim:

HON. JUSTICE ALLAN B. HALLOWAY’S RESPONSE

MY RIGHT TO REPLY: RESPONSE TO THE CALABASH NEWSPAPER

FROM: THE HON. MR. JUSTICE ALLAN B. HALLOWAY JSC

DATE: 25th September 2025

TO: The Editor, The Calabash Newspaper

SUBJECT: Re: Right to Reply – Allegations and Report on Your Suspension

I acknowledge your letter and thank you for your professionalism in offering me the right to reply, in keeping with the tenets of fair journalism and the IMC Code of Practice. I expect that my responses will be published in full and with complete accuracy, and I reserve the right to a further reply should any part of my response be altered, misrepresented, or published out of context.

I categorically and unequivocally reject the baseless allegations contained in your proposed article. The narrative you have been provided is a malicious fabrication, designed to obscure the true issue: a gross, unconstitutional campaign of victimization and retaliation against me for challenging the excesses of the Chief Justice. Below is my point-by-point rebuttal, grounded in fact and law.

1. ON THE ALLEGATION OF A 15-YEAR CASE BACKLOG

This allegation is technically and factually impossible. As your own investigations should have revealed, I was not in continuous service on the bench for a significant period encompassing the alleged 15-year backlog. I was previously targeted in a politically motivated witch-hunt orchestrated by then-Anti-Corruption Commissioner Abdul Tejan-Cole. Following a successful legal challenge that vindicated me completely, the Government of Sierra Leone reinstated me with full compensation, acknowledging the wrongful nature of that earlier persecution. The current allegations are a continuation of that same pattern of persecution. It is a logical absurdity to accuse a judge of a backlog for years during which he was unconstitutionally prevented from performing his duties.

2. ON THE ALLEGATIONS OF BRIBERY AND EXTORTION

These allegations are not only false but have been previously manufactured and have conclusively failed. The reference to Abdul Tejan-Cole is instructive. This individual, who once enjoyed the hospitality of my family home, for personal reasons orchestrated a failed sting operation against me. The crucial fact your sources have omitted is that I flatly refused the purported bribe. The ACC, having processed the money and sent an individual to my chambers under surveillance, found no evidence of wrongdoing on my part. My subsequent reinstatement and full compensation by the state is a matter of public record and serves as a complete vindication. Allegations are not evidence, and in this case, the allegations have already been tested and found to be without merit. I have never been found wanton for any misconduct by any competent legal authority.

3. ON THE “GROSS INSUBORDINATION” AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE’S DIRECTIVES

The framing of this issue is misleading. My correspondence with the Chief Justice, which began with my letter of 11th August 2025, was not about “insubordination” regarding case files. It was a formal complaint, based on Section 138(3) of the Constitution of Sierra Leone, 1991, regarding his unlawful actions in withholding my allowances, blocking my fuel supply, and varying my conditions of service to my disadvantage. The administrative measures you mention were not disciplinary actions for a backlog; they were the unconstitutional acts that precipitated my complaint. They were the cause of the dispute, not a consequence of it.

4. ON THE NATURE OF MY LETTER OF 11TH AUGUST 2025

I did not “petition the President.” I wrote a letter to the Chief Justice, outlining his unconstitutional conduct, and copied it to several state institutions and civil society organizations as is my right. My letter was an exercise of my constitutional right to seek redress and to expose a grave constitutional breach. It is disingenuous to suggest that a Judge must suffer in silence when his own constitutional protections are being violated by the head of the judiciary.

5. ON THE JUDICIAL AND LEGAL SERVICE COMMISSION (JLSC) TRIBUNAL PROCESS

The JLSC process was a sham, devoid of any legality or fairness. I draw your attention to the attached dissenting letter from The Hon. Mr. Justice Reginald Sydney Fynn JA, a member of the JLSC who was present at the meeting of 5th September 2025. His letter to His Excellency the President, which you must publish in full, reveals the truth:

There was no clear statement of misconduct against me.

The Chief Justice acted as “complainant and Chairman” in his own cause, a fundamental breach of natural justice (nemo judex in causa sua).

I was not informed of the charges or given an opportunity to be heard (audi alteram partem).

The decision was made in a “cloud of anger” without proper notice, based on old newspaper clippings.

Justice Fynn’s dissent exposes the tribunal recommendation for what it is: a retaliatory measure, not a bona fide disciplinary process. Furthermore, the suspension itself is unconstitutional, as Section 137(6) of the Constitution requires a tribunal to be appointed first; a step that was ignored.

6. ON “BREACH OF JUDICIAL PROTOCOL”

I challenge you or your sources to produce the specific “protocol” that forbids a Judge from copying a letter to civil society or the press when he reasonably believes his constitutional rights are under threat. There is no law or legally binding protocol that supersedes my fundamental right to expose a constitutional breach. Copying the fourth estate and civil society organizations was a lawful act to ensure transparency and accountability in a matter of significant public interest. The attempt to frame this as a breach is a smokescreen to avoid scrutiny of the substantive constitutional issues I raised.

7. ON THE CONDUCT OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE VICTIMIZATION OF JUSTICE FYNN

Your letter confirms you have not investigated the conduct of the Chief Justice. I urge you to do so immediately. The recent, vindictive removal of Justice Fynn from his positions as President of the Court of Appeal, Tutor at the Judicial Training Institute, and member of the Ethics Committee is a clear, retaliatory act for his dissent. This is a textbook case of abuse of office, contrary to the Anti-Corruption Act 2008 (as amended), and confirms the tyrannical pattern of governance I complained of. A Chief Justice who punishes dissent within the judiciary is a grave danger to judicial independence.

CONCLUSION

The allegations against me are a tissue of lies designed to tarnish my reputation and deflect from the serious constitutional violations I have documented. My conduct has always been consistent with, and in defence of, the Constitution of Sierra Leone. The real story is not a fictional backlog or baseless bribery claims, but the systemic abuse of power by the Chief Justice, the unconstitutional suspension of a judge who dared to speak out, and the subsequent punishment of another judge, Justice Fynn, for upholding the principles of justice.

I trust you will publish this response in its entirety, thereby fulfilling your duty to present a fair and balanced account to the public.

THE HON. MR. JUSTICE ALLAN B. HALLOWAY JSC

Time For Africa’s Christians To Oppose Israel’s Genocide And Occupation

Christian Zionism distorts scripture to justify Israel’s occupation of Palestine, betraying Jesus’ teachings of universal love and justice, writes Reverend Frank Chikane

In June, the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches (WCC) met in Johannesburg, South Africa. The Central Committee (CC) speaks on behalf of 352 member churches, representing more than half a billion Christians around the world. It comprises 158 members, the WCC regional presidents and 100 advisors from the wider ecumenical movement. Its purpose is to make policy decisions and address issues affecting the life and witness of the churches. After deep lamentation and outrage as the crisis in Palestine and Israel escalates to unprecedented levels of starvation and collective punishment of the entire population of Gaza, the CC’s plenary session sounded four powerful, urgent and long overdue  calls to action.

Firstly, it called for the naming of the reality of the system of apartheid imposed by Israel on the Palestinian people. Churches, states and international institutions were urged to take a moral stand and immediately impose sanctions, divestment and arms embargoes to hold Israel accountable for its actions. Moral condemnation, after all, must have material consequences. The CC also demanded the end of the Israeli occupation of Palestine and the lifting of its unlawful blockade on Gaza. The CC also called for support for the resilience and witness of Palestinian Christian churches and communities to remain on their land and to freely practice their faith; a fundamental right that the Israeli Government denies them.

Sadly, it has taken far too long for the WCC to issue a clear, truthful recognition of the roots and realities of Palestinians’ suffering and a call to the global fellowship of churches to speak with clarity, urgency and commitment. However, these resolutions signal a bold break from past WCC positions on Israel’s eight decade-long occupation of Palestine. Many churches and ecumenical organizations have prioritized unity, rather than justice, when it comes to the unbearable suffering inflicted by Israel on Palestinians. Some of us have skirted around this issue to keep the “peace” in our congregations and to avoid offending our Jewish colleagues and risk being accused of antisemitism. This is unnecessary. As Christians, we make a clear distinction between the Jewish people, our siblings in faith and the acts of the Israeli Government that acts in the name of Zionism. As African Christians, who have witnessed and experienced injustices and colonialism, standing on the side of justice should be natural to us. Our own scars of colonialism make it impossible to ignore the same pattern of land grabs, military occupation and erasure playing out in Palestine.

God’s covenant with Abraham in Genesis 12:3 wherein He promises that “those who bless Israel will be blessed and those who curse Israel will be cursed” is often wrested from its context and misquoted by the Israeli Government and its Christian Zionist supporters in Africa. They want believers to accept that any critique of the state of Israel, for its assault on international law and basic human rights and decency, is to curse Israel and incur God’s Wrath. Christian Zionism is, in fact, an annulment of everything that the just Christian gospel stands for.

It is in defence of the Christian gospel that we as African Christians must renounce, in the strongest terms possible, any attempts to defend the Israeli occupation and oppression of the Palestinian people using the Bible. The Christianity that Christian Zionists ask us to practice makes our faith a servant of oppression, similar to how the Bible was used to justify colonialism throughout Africa and apartheid in South Africa.

Jesus Christ Himself is Christian Zionism’s greatest adversary. Its teachings fly in the face of the central tenets of the covenant that Jesus introduced to the world. Neither Jesus nor His early apostles preached Christian Zionism. Christian Zionism distorts scripture to justify Israel’s occupation of Palestine, betraying Jesus’ teachings of universal love and justice.

Yet, some African Christian leaders and their congregations continue to misguidedly support Israel, even hosting Israeli ambassadors and Government officials at their church services and praying for the Israeli military and Government that is currently perpetrating a genocide in Gaza! This goes against the very essence of Amos 5:24 (NRSV) that implores us to “let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.”

One of the central messages of the gospel is that those liberated by God cannot be made slaves by anyone. But this is exactly what is happening today in occupied Palestine. Freedom for one group cannot come through the oppression of another. Israeli security and peace cannot be built at the expense of Palestinian life, security, dignity and peace. It is time for Africa’s churches and ministries to support the WCC calls for justice and speak with one voice in opposing Israeli occupation, apartheid and genocide. Africa’s silence would be a betrayal of both our faith and our history.

Reverend Frank Chikane is a veteran South African anti-apartheid activist, theologian, civil servant and writer. He currently chairs the Anti-Apartheid Conference for Palestine & Against Israeli Apartheid.

Legal Aid Board Defends 71 Accused During September High Court Session

The Legal Aid Board (LAB) has provided legal representation for 71 accused persons during the September Criminal Session of the High Court, which ran from Tuesday 16 to Friday 19 September 2025 at the Freetown High Court No. 1 on Siaka Stevens Street.

The session coincided with the commencement of the new Criminal Procedure Act (CPA) 2024. Proceedings were initially presided over by the Honourable Chief Justice, His Lordship Justice Komba Kamanda, and later by Honourable Justice A.T. Ganda, JA.

In all, 93 cases were called before the court. Eight of the accused persons were absent, 14 were defended by private counsel, while 71 benefited from the services of the Legal Aid Board. The offences ranged from conspiracy to commit migrant smuggling, attempted human trafficking, bigamy and embezzlement to unlawful possession and manufacturing of prohibited drugs, conspiracy to defraud, murder, larceny, wounding with intent, robbery with aggravation, shop breaking and larceny, larceny from a person and fraudulent conversion.

Out of the 71 represented by the Board, 26 cases were concluded. Two of the accused were cautioned and discharged, while 24 were sentenced to varying prison terms.

In addressing the two who were discharged, the Executive Director of the Legal Aid Board, Ms. Fatmata Claire Carlton-Hanciles, cautioned them against reoffending. She stressed that with limited staff and few lawyers, the Board would be challenged to continue representing repeat offenders.

She further urged them to be satisfied with whatever little they have and to return to their communities as responsible citizens who contribute positively to society.

Representation for the accused was handled by Legal Aid Counsels Cecilia Tucker Esq., Cyril Taylor-Younge Esq., Olu V. Garber Esq., and Bankole C.E. Morgan Esq., reaffirming the Board’s mandate to ensure equal access to justice for all, particularly for those who cannot afford private legal services.

Defence Ministry, SLP & Correctional Service Present 2026 Budget Plans to Finance Ministry

Budget hearings for the 2026 fiscal year continued at the Ministry of Finance last week, with the Sierra Leone Correctional Service (SLCS), the Ministry of Defence and the Sierra Leone Police presenting their respective proposals. Each institution highlighted critical interventions aimed at strengthening national security and building people-centred forces.

Commissioner Joseph John Senessie of the Sierra Leone Correctional Service underscored key priorities, including the recruitment of 1,000 correctional officers and the construction of new correctional centres in Kamakwie and Mongo Bendugu. He noted the completion of the administrative building at New England and plans for additional expansion blocks at the Moyamba Correctional Centre.

He also revealed that SLCS intends to build new accommodation facilities for officers, acquire industrial equipment to facilitate mass food production for inmates and introduce an integrated prison management system to boost efficiency and accountability. The Commissioner stressed that those initiatives will enhance security, broaden rehabilitation programs and generate additional revenue for the Government. For those interventions, the SLCS requested an indicative budget of NLe179, 965,500 for Fiscal Year 2026.

Lieutenant-General Amara I. Bangura, Chief of Defence Staff, outlined the Ministry of Defence’s mandate to protect Sierra Leone’s territorial integrity and ensure the Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces (RSLAF) remains professional, disciplined and combat-ready. He disclosed plans to recruit and train 1,500 personnel while advancing technological upgrades, including computer communication systems, command modules, drones and ISTAR capabilities, to enhance operational awareness.

The Chief of Defence Staff also emphasized the importance of improving infrastructure, noting ongoing refurbishments of four barracks and other military facilities. He highlighted that better accommodations would improve morale and reduce medical costs for personnel. The Ministry of Defence and RSLAF submitted a budget estimate of NLe412, 000 for FY2026.

On behalf of the Sierra Leone Police, Assistant Commissioner of Police Allieu Turay presented a proposal that prioritizes the recruitment of 1,000 new officers and the modernization of the Police Garment Factory. The plans also include the procurement of operational uniforms, as well as upgrades to Police Headquarters and other key facilities nationwide.

He emphasized that the Sierra Leone Police is committed to enhancing operational capacity, improving service delivery and maintaining professionalism and accountability in safeguarding citizens. The institution’s budget proposal totals NLe576, 534.3, with recurrent expenditure projected at NLe364, 584.7 and revenue projections of NLe2, 943,755 for 2026.

The budget submissions by the SLCS, Ministry of Defence and Sierra Leone Police underscore Government’s continued prioritization of national security, institutional reforms and improved service delivery as critical pillars for stability and development in Sierra Leone.

Statistician General Briefs PPRC Interparty Dialogue on Progress Towards 2026 Census

The Statistician General and Chief Census Officer for the 2026 Population and Housing Census, Andrew Bob Johnny, has assured political parties of the credibility and transparency of the upcoming census during the 7th Interparty Dialogue Committee (IPDC) meeting organized by the Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC) on September 25, 2025 at the New Brookfields Hotel in Freetown.

In his detailed presentation, Andrew Bob Johnny described the census as a “momentous national endeavor” vital to Sierra Leone’s development planning. He stressed that credible census data provides the foundation for evidence-based decision-making, equitable resource allocation and monitoring socio-economic change over time. “We simply cannot plan effectively as a country without credible census data; it is the sine qua non for national development over the next decade,” he stated.

Andrew Bob Johnny explained that specialized committees have been set up to oversee the process, including an Advisory Committee comprising political party representatives, a Technical Committee to design census instruments, a Publicity Committee to drive awareness, and the Census Secretariat as the operational hub.

He reported that training for cartographic mapping started nationwide on September 22, 2025 and will last for ten days, followed by fieldwork to delineate enumeration areas over the next six months. A pilot census, in line with United Nations standards, will be conducted in December 2025 ahead of the full enumeration exercise in December 2026.

On Government support, Andrew Bob Johnny, praised the investment of $24 million already committed towards procurement of advanced technologies, vehicles, tablets, laptops and Starlink internet services. He revealed, however, that a funding gap of $13 million remains and called on development partners, donors and the private sector to assist. He further commended the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for leading donor coordination.

Emphasizing inclusivity, Andrew Bob Johnny assured the dialogue that the census will be transparent, participatory and simplified for both enumerators and respondents. “The questionnaire has been simplified for ease of use and we are committed to engaging stakeholders at all levels,” he affirmed.

Representatives of political parties welcomed the progress. Leonard Balogun Koroma of the All People’s Congress (APC) praised Stats SL’s openness but encouraged earlier engagement with parties for fuller participation. Another APC representative, Sidi Yaya Tunis, urged political leaders to support the census rather than undermine it, stressing the importance of mobilizing citizens.

From the Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP), Ahmed Saybom Kanu called for stronger involvement of Paramount Chiefs and local authorities, noting that “the census is not a political exercise;it is a tool for national development.”

Other representatives, including those from the All Political Parties Association (APPA), expressed similar support and gave constructive feedback. The meeting ended with broad consensus that the 2026 Population and Housing Census will be an essential step in shaping Sierra Leone’s future development.

At UN High-Level Event… President Bio Calls for Justice, Reparations & Dignity for Survivors of Wartime Rape

By Amin Kef (Ranger)

President Julius Maada Bio of Sierra Leone has delivered a compelling appeal for urgent global action to protect survivors of sexual violence in conflict and the children born as a result of such crimes. He made that call on Thursday, 25 September 2025, during a High-Level Event on Pregnancy, Children Born and Sexual Violence in Conflict held in New York, United States of America.

Commending the First Lady of Sierra Leone, Madam Fatima Maada Bio and the United Nations Secretary-General’s Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Pramila Patten, for convening the dialogue, President Bio described the issue as confronting “a painful reality, the plight of women and girls who become pregnant as a result of sexual violence in conflict and the stigma endured by children born of such violence.”

Drawing from Sierra Leone’s tragic past, President Bio recalled the horrors of the country’s decade-long civil war, during which an estimated 20,000 children were born of rape and girls as young as 12 were forced into sexual slavery. “These memories compel us to act,” he declared, emphasizing the moral obligation to prevent such violations from recurring anywhere in the world.

Highlighting Sierra Leone’s national response, President Bio outlined landmark initiatives such as the declaration of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence as a national emergency, the creation of a dedicated Sexual Offences Court, the expansion of One-Stop Centres for survivors and robust protections against early marriage. He also underscored the role of the Government’s flagship Free Quality Education Programme in empowering vulnerable girls and providing pathways to recovery.

On the international front, Sierra Leone has continued to champion the Women, Peace and Security agenda, advocating that sexual violence in conflict must be treated as both a grave human rights violation and a direct threat to peace and security. In 2022, Sierra Leone, working in partnership with Japan, successfully advanced the first UN resolution on remedies for victims of sexual violence, affirming survivors’ rights to justice, reparations and rehabilitation.

President Bio endorsed the recommendations of the UN Secretary-General, urging the international community to ensure survivor-centred services, guarantee nationality and rights for children born of rape, integrate survivors into peacebuilding processes and provide adequate funding for reparations and reintegration. He stressed that the voices of survivors must be central to shaping effective solutions. “Our shared humanity requires us to act now. Let this event serve as a turning point where our words are matched with concrete commitments. We must build a world where no woman’s body is used as a battlefield and where every child enjoys dignity, rights and hope,” he concluded.

The event also featured powerful contributions from the First Lady of Sierra Leone, Madam Fatima Maada Bio; the First Lady of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Denise Nyakeru Tshisekedi and Pramila Patten, the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict.

UNFPA Goodwill Ambassador, Madam Isha Sesay, who moderated the session, presented a summary of the Global Declaration of Principles on the Rights of Children Born of Conflict-Related Rape, reinforcing the urgent call for collective global action.

MIWGEM Hosts Transformative Symposium to Empower Women and Girls in the Media

By Ibrahim John Sesay

The Media Initiative for Women and Girls Empowerment (MIWGEM) has taken a major step in advancing women’s participation in the media by successfully hosting a two-day symposium and training on September 23 and 24, 2025 at the Special Court in New England Ville, Freetown. Held under the theme: “Using the Media to Raise Voices: The Power to Create and Amplify the Voices of Women and Girls,” the symposium gathered young women and girls from across Sierra Leone and connected them with seasoned professionals committed to fostering empowerment and change.

In her welcome address, Mabinty Kamara, a member of the Media Initiative for Women and Girls Empowerment, reminded participants that the training was designed to help them claim space in the media and raise their voices. She urged them to stay focused, embrace the opportunities before them and be part of meaningful change.

Founder and Coordinator of the Media Initiative for Women and Girls Empowerment, Adama Bai Conteh Esq., underscored the organization’s mission to equip women with the tools to shape narratives and challenge societal norms. She explained that since MIWGEM’s establishment in 2017 it has empowered hundreds of women and girls in the media to unlock their potential and lead change within their communities.

The symposium featured powerful testimonies from female leaders in the Sierra Leonean media landscape. President of Women in the Media Sierra Leone, Eastina Taylor, inspired participants with her journey into journalism, describing how storytelling became her tool to fight injustice and advocate for the voiceless.

Similarly, President of the Sierra Leone Association of Women in Journalism, Millicent Kargbo, shared her struggles and triumphs in the industry, encouraging participants to remain visible, resilient and impactful in every space they occupy.

The training also welcomed notable contributions from distinguished professionals and advocates. John Konteh, Marketing Director of Afrimoney Sierra Leone, emphasized the importance of building a credible media presence rooted in values and authenticity.

Award-winning Television Presenter and Executive Producer, Stella Bangura, guided participants on the art of storytelling and impactful interviewing, describing storytelling as the foundation of strong content creation.

International partners also added depth to the discussions. Exchange Coordinator at the United States Embassy in Freetown, Lansana Fofana, highlighted scholarship opportunities and exchange programs such as Mandela Washington, YALI Regional and the Fulbright Scholarship.

Alfred Halim Navo Esq., Head of Administration at the Embassy of Ireland, introduced the AMO method, Ability, Motivation and Opportunity, as a framework for aspiring professionals to succeed.

Practical sessions further enriched the symposium. Fatmata Kamara, Co-Cofounder of Girls Behind the Lens and professional photographer Jacob Lawrence Lahai provided hands-on lessons in photography, from mastering camera angles to understanding ISO, shutter speed and aperture.

Ronald Sesay, Co-founder of IPro Multimedia, shared his journey as a professional photographer and videographer for the Sierra Leone Football Association, encouraging participants to view photography and videography as powerful tools of storytelling.

Prominent voices in law and communications also made their mark. Abdul Malik Bangura Esq., a Barrister and Media Advocate, spoke on communication and public relations, stressing the need for self-assessment and confidence-building.

James Fortune, Executive Director of the West African Youth Network, introduced the ACE method, Assertion, Citation and Explanation, as a guide to mastering public speaking. He described public speaking as the art of effective communication that every media professional must learn.

Amadu Lamrana Bah, Co-founder of Truth Media, closed the symposium with words of encouragement, urging participants to tell positive stories and use their platforms to promote change. He emphasized that the lessons gained during the training must be put into practice to strengthen Sierra Leone’s media landscape.

The two-day symposium concluded with renewed confidence among participants, who pledged to apply their knowledge in amplifying the voices of women and girls through media. The event not only connected young women with influential mentors but also underscored MIWGEM’s pivotal role in creating a stronger, more inclusive media industry in Sierra Leone.

NCRA, IOM Sign Agreement to Provide Legal Identity for 1,000 Migrants and Stateless Persons

By Foday Moriba Conteh

In a bid to provide vital legal identity credentials for migrants and persons at risk of statelessness in Sierra Leone, the National Civil Registration Authority (NCRA) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) have signed a service agreement. The signing ceremony was held on Thursday, September 25, 2025 at the NCRA headquarters on Kingharman Road in Freetown.

Speaking at the event, Mohamed Mubashir Massaquoi, Director General of NCRA, described the agreement as a milestone in the Government’s commitment to inclusivity and protection of vulnerable groups.

“This initiative ensures that every resident of Sierra Leone is accounted for, whether citizen or migrant. With the support of IOM we will provide 1,000 beneficiaries with legal identity documents (700 with national ID cards and 300 with birth certificates),” Mohamed Mubashir Massaquoi said.

He emphasized that access to legal identity is fundamental to enjoying human rights and accessing essential services such as education, healthcare, business registration, banking, communication and social security.

According to the agreement, NCRA will deploy registration teams to designated points, including border areas and reception facilities, to document migrants and provide them with legal credentials. This, Mohamed Mubashir Massaquoi added, will prevent vulnerable groups from being classified as stateless and enable them to reintegrate into their communities.

“Our Government is committed to running an inclusive state where no one is left behind. By providing legal identity we are not only safeguarding rights but also ensuring that every vital event in our population is properly recorded,” Mohamed Mubashir Massaquoi noted.

According to him the agreement will commence with immediate effect and forms part of broader efforts to strengthen Sierra Leone’s civil registration and vital statistics system, while also meeting international obligations to protect the rights of migrants and stateless persons.

On her part, Dr. Pauline Macharia, Officer-in-Charge of IOM Sierra Leone, described the initiative as a “long-awaited but critical step” in safeguarding the rights of migrants.

“This process has been a long time coming and it is vital in ensuring that returning migrants receive their documentation so they can access services like any other citizen,” Dr. Pauline Macharia said. “Identification is key to reintegration, whether in education, business, healthcare or other opportunities.”

She noted that recent migration trends show an increasing number of women and children returning to Sierra Leone, many of whom lack birth certificates or other legal documents. “Without documentation, children face challenges enrolling in school while adults struggle to access basic services. Providing these credentials is therefore essential for sustainable reintegration,” she added.

Under the agreement, 1,000 beneficiaries will be supported (700 with national ID cards and 300 with birth certificates). Dr. Pauline Macharia stressed the importance of extending the services beyond Freetown to reach migrants in districts such as Bo and Kenema, so they do not have to travel long distances to access documentation.

She also highlighted IOM’s role in migration coordination, noting that NCRA is part of the Return and Reintegration Working Group, which focuses on making returns “dignified, protection-oriented and sustainable.”

“These are Sierra Leoneans who left in search of better opportunities and are now returning voluntarily to rebuild their lives and contribute to national development. They deserve to be recognized, documented and supported,” she emphasized.

Dr. Pauline Macharia reaffirmed IOM’s commitment to continue working with NCRA and other partners to strengthen migration management and ensure no returning migrant is denied access to services because of lack of identification.

The event was formally concluded with the signing of the agreement between Mohamed Mubashir Massaquoi, Director General of NCRA, and Dr. Pauline Macharia, Officer-in-Charge of IOM Sierra Leone.

NP CEO Dr. Mohamed S. Kanu Pays Courtesy Visit to NPRA Director General

By Amin Kef (Ranger)

The newly appointed Chief Executive Officer of NP Sierra Leone Limited (NP-SL), Dr. Mohamed S. Kanu, has paid a courtesy visit to the Director General of the National Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NPRA), Dr. Brima Baluwa Koroma, on Wednesday, 24 September 2025, at the Authority’s office on Tower Hill in Freetown.

Director General, Dr. Brima Baluwa Koroma warmly welcomed the NP (SL) delegation, describing the visit as timely and strategic. He underscored the importance of the engagement noting that it provides the right platform for the incoming CEO to familiarize himself with stakeholders at a time of significant shifts in the petroleum sector. He praised Dr. Mohamed S. Kanu’s over two decades of experience both locally and internationally, saying such expertise will bring new energy and vision to the company’s operations.

“NP remains the single largest taxpayer in the petroleum industry and one of the biggest employers in Sierra Leone,” Dr. Baluwa Koroma said, adding that the Authority views the company as the Government’s closest partner in sustaining economic growth. He encouraged NP to continue setting standards in the market by adopting international best practices, maintaining its leadership role and ensuring that its operations align with today’s rapidly changing business environment.

The NPRA Director General appealed to the new CEO to leverage his knowledge of diverse markets to anticipate challenges and take strategic business decisions that will guarantee NP’s growth and long-term sustainability. He stressed that NPRA will continue to regulate within the legal framework, ensuring a balance between protecting investors’ interests and safeguarding consumer welfare.

Responding, Dr. Mohamed S. Kanu expressed appreciation for the reforms spearheaded by NPRA over the last six years noting that the Authority is now far more visible and proactive compared to previous years. He highlighted his recent international roles as CEO in NP Gambia, NP Guinea, NP Liberia and most recently NP Côte d’Ivoire, saying that his exposure to competitive markets has prepared him to navigate the uncertainties facing Sierra Leone’s petroleum industry.

“I am assuming leadership at a time of challenges and uncertainties, but I am confident that with my experience and the support of regulators, NP will continue to thrive,” Dr. Mohamed S. Kanu stated. He pledged closer collaboration with NPRA, stressing the need for consistent engagement to sustain NP’s leadership as the country’s major petroleum operator.

The meeting marked a significant start to Dr. Mohamed S. Kanu’s tenure as CEO, signaling renewed collaboration between NP Sierra Leone and the petroleum regulator to ensure stability, sustainability and continued excellence in service delivery.

1...124125126...1,336Page 125 of 1,336