A productive collaborative effort between the Ghana Water Company Limited and VEI (Netherlands) reached its culmination as a six-member delegation from the Low-Income Customer Support Department concluded a 5-day working visit to the Guma Valley Water Company. This initiative falls under the European Union Water Operators Partnership Program (EU-WOP), a program centered on fostering mutual support, knowledge exchange, and capacity enhancement among water and sanitation operators.
The visit, marked by a commitment towards achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 6 of universal access to clean water and sanitation, aimed to bolster the operational efficiency of utilities.
The Chief Manager of Ghana Water’s Low-Income Customer Support Department, Faustina Boachie, highlighted that the main objective of the visit was to aid in the transformation of the Community Services Unit of Guma Valley Water Company into a distinct Department.
She emphasized, “Enhancing visibility of low-income customers within a utility directly correlates with the quality of service they receive.”
Acknowledging the substantial progress made through the EU-WOP partnership, Boachie stressed that the visit aimed to ensure alignment with predefined goals and delivery of agreed-upon outcomes. The extensive training provided to staff members of both Ghana Water and Guma Valley over the past year was lauded by Boachie, who expressed optimism in the positive influence of these training initiatives on the functioning of the Community Services Unit.
Krijn Driessen, the Project Manager of the EU-WOP, underscored the significance of establishing a department to attract external funding, citing a notable example of UNICEF’s interest in replicating the Ghana model in Sierra Leone and emphasized the prerequisite of a department for such endeavors.
Responding to the partnership’s objectives, Ing. Maada S. Kpenge, Managing Director of Guma Valley Water Company, emphasized the company’s core commitment to improving water supply services for urban populations with limited financial resources.
She stressed the need for innovative approaches to meet the water needs of low-income communities, while highlighting Guma’s efforts to integrate the Community Service Unit with Peri-Urban services.
The culmination of the visit witnessed the finalization of Financial Plans for Years 1 and 2 of the partnership, the establishment of a financial transaction recording model, an assessment of Guma’s corporate structure, and a knowledge-sharing session on forming a dedicated Community Services Department. In addition to internal discussions, the delegation engaged with representatives from the European Delegation in Sierra Leone and UNICEF, discussing strategies to fortify the capacity of Guma’s Community Services Unit.
The visit’s practical dimension involved on-site evaluations of service delivery models in communities such as Kroo Bay and Collier Compound (Juba). These evaluations aimed to identify the most effective approaches to cater to the unique needs of each community.
With this successful visit’s conclusion, the collaborative efforts of Ghana Water Company Limited and VEI under the EU-WOP program are poised to make significant strides in enhancing water supply capabilities for marginalized urban communities. The commitment to sustainable development remains steadfast, as these operators continue to work towards equitable water access for all.


Unjustly Vilifying Dr.Gilpin
By Amin Kef (Ranger)
In a manner reminiscent of Aesop’s fable, recent events have cast a spotlight on the allegations surrounding Dr. Ekundayo Walton Gilpin, the esteemed Managing Director of Sierra Leone’s prominent financial institution, Rokel Commercial Bank (RCBank). The narrative surrounding these accusations draws parallels to the fox’s sour grapes rationalization – when unable to attain his desires he rationalizes by deeming them undesirable. In this contemporary context, videos circulating on social media have taken aim at RCBank, accusing it of disbursing inaccurate or insufficient funds to its clientele.
However, it is crucial to discern the veracity of such claims in relation to Dr. Gilpin’s character and the bank’s reputation. It is widely acknowledged that Dr. Gilpin’s standing far exceeds the realm of these trivial allegations. Observers closely tracking RCBank’s trajectory can readily affirm that he would not countenance such improprieties. Should he possess knowledge of these allegations, he is anticipated to promptly investigate their authenticity, potentially leading to decisive consequences for those implicated.
These allegations surface during a pivotal juncture, as Dr. Gilpin and his dedicated team labor assiduously to perpetuate the transformation of RCBank into a paragon of trustworthiness and profitability within Sierra Leone’s financial landscape. This elevation of RCBank’s standing invariably invokes the envy of competing commercial banks throughout the nation. One cannot discount the possibility that these attempts to besmirch RCBank’s reputation and its MD stem from the ranks of its competitors.
In a nation like Sierra Leone, few occurrences truly astonish, and skepticism often shrouds events of this nature. Moreover, additional claims assail RCBank and Dr. Gilpin, alleging a refusal to furnish audit reports. This assertion rings not only ludicrous but also malevolent. Dr. Gilpin, a distinguished financial expert, comprehends the vital importance of meticulous financial record-keeping. The notion that he would deliberately withhold a document detailing the bank’s progress and financial matters seems both audacious and nonsensical.
To those habituated to tarnishing the reputation of diligent members of society, a cautionary note resounds – the scales of justice eventually tip towards retribution. Conversely, Dr. Gilpin remains unfazed by the viral proliferation of these attacks on RCBank’s reputation across social media platforms. Grounded in his devout Christian beliefs, he perceives these attacks as motivational forces, fortifying his determination to uphold RCBank’s lofty status, credibility, and transparency.
Behind these allegations lies an insidious narrative – the orchestrations of certain individuals within and outside RCBank who harbor ulterior motives. Their intent is twofold: to divert the focus of the diligent Managing Director and his committed team, while concurrently eroding the bank’s reputation and integrity. However, a prevailing belief in divine justice persists, ensuring that those responsible for these machinations will eventually be exposed.
In conclusion, as we navigate this narrative , it is imperative to view these allegations against Dr. Gilpin and RCBank through a lens of critical scrutiny. Their responses to these challenges, guided by unwavering determination and a commitment to transparency, will undoubtedly shape the trajectory of RCBank’s future. In the grand scheme of things, the approbation of President Bio, a testament to Dr. Gilpin’s accomplishments, remains the ultimate vindication of his character and efforts.